![Accesorios para pesca](https://kumkoniak.com/53.jpg)
![cessna 162 vs 172 cessna 162 vs 172](https://kcdn.hangar67.com/photos/10059/e3fe08e758.jpg)
#Cessna 162 vs 172 serial number#
This new propeller quickly became the new standard for the Cessna 162 serial number 108 and on and is available for all Skycatchers as an upgrade. This is the ASTM-certified 1L100 propeller and was made specifically for the Cessna Skycatcher carrying a TCM O-200D engine.
![cessna 162 vs 172 cessna 162 vs 172](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/QEp7-5c2tQ4/maxresdefault.jpg)
A couple of years later, however, in 2011, McCauley designed and delivered a fixed-pitch all-composite two-blade propeller designed for the Skycatcher. First planned as a composite two-blader, the original propeller was nevertheless made out of aluminum alloy. Powered by the O-200D is a two-bladed, fixed pitch propeller. For the new Cessna Skycatcher though, TMC slimmed down the O-200, turning out the O-200D, a carburetor-equipped, four-cylinder engine that’s a whole 30 pounds lighter than the O-200. When the 162 was on the drawing board, the older TCM O-200 was already in use powering a number of S-LSA aircraft. Under this hood, it carries its 100-hp Teledyne Continental Motors O-200D engine. Its structure is made from aluminum, with a fiberglass hood. This single-engine piston, high-wing monoplane has an all-metal semi-monocoque airframe. But as we shall see, God and the devil are in the details. This should come as no surprise, Cessna had designed and built over 100,000 high wings after all. What are the Cessna 162’s Design Features? The Exteriorįrom the outside, the Skycatcher bears a clear resemblance to other single-engine tricycle gear planes. Let’s have a look at some of the unique design features that set the Skycatcher apart, below. However, the Skycather was designed and built in the early 2000s, making it a modern aircraft, and giving it an edge over older planes designed in the mid-1900s. With roughly 23 feet in length and a 30-foot wingspan, it’s a slightly smaller airplane than its older siblings. It is a single-engine aircraft with a two-bladed fixed-pitch propeller. What sets it apart is that it adheres to the restrictions of the LSA, at a maximum takeoff weight of 1,320 pounds. The word sporty is apt since it was specifically developed to fit into the LSA category, a category that was brand new back in 2004.Īs such it fills much the same niche as its predecessors the Cessna 150 and 152. The Cessna Skycatcher is a lightweight two-seater that has been described as both sporty and maneuverable. Let’s then look at how it fits into the modern setting, including what sets it apart from its competition today. A brief history of the Skycatcher will help us understand the niche it was meant to fill, as well as the complicated circumstances that surrounded its release. The Skycatcher is a well-built aircraft that performs well across the board.
![cessna 162 vs 172 cessna 162 vs 172](https://sky4buy.com/img/Cessna-Skyhawk-C172L-131498768527/1.jpg)
Only 275 Cessna Skycather would ever be produced, for reasons that had more to do with unfortunate manufacturing decisions, and less with the design and performance of the aircraft. Range and power are on par with the Cessna 150, while its lighter weight grants it an impressive climb rate and gives it an excellent roll response, outperforming both the Skyhawk and the Skylane. The Cessna Skycatcher is nimble and responsive, with overall good handling qualities. This light-weight two-seater is in many ways its own category.ĭesigned in 2007 to fit into the newly-minted Light Sport Aircraft category, while retaining a striking resemblance to earlier Cessnas, the Cessna 162 incorporates features of both lighter and heavier aircraft. But still why would they put that POH that is different from the currently model they are flying.īefore, I give them a call in regards to this, i wanted to see if anyone had further input.No other single-engine piston aircraft is quite like the Cessna Skycatcher. I am aware that the FARs required for the POH to be on board any time. Why would they post a POH's different model? Could this just be a mistake from their side? Or if they posted that POH just as a reference to study, - is that even something smart to do? (to me just does not sound right) So, I begin investigating a Cessna 172S POH and found they are similar (unless im looking at an old expired revision POH)Īlthough, both POHs might look a bit similar, there is a difference for example, in the Horse Power Rating and Engine Speed. This is a bit confusing for me because shouldn't they be using a Cessna 172 S-POH and not a 172 R POH. The flight school that I am about to start taking flight lessons has a Cessna 172S when I go into their website and check out the Cessna 172s POH, I see that that the POH has a different model (Cessna 172 -R). Asked by: chackaviation 2252 views Aircraft Systems, FAA Regulations, General Aviation, Light Sport Aircraft, Private Pilot, Student Pilot
![Accesorios para pesca](https://kumkoniak.com/53.jpg)